Can you describe this in three dimensions? Of course not. Fundamentally, the notion that “reality” is three-dimensional (or four-dimensional, if you include the concept of time) is based on a mathematical depiction of a box, but it doesn’t even describe what kind of box, its color, smell, materials, or anything beyond spatial measurements.
Nothing in nature can be described in three dimensions, yet mathematical rigidity limits our minds to its man-made constructs and inhibits understanding of the “essences” of physical reality.
Albert Einstein could never accept quantum physics, because he believed science should be able to predict with certainty. That a quantum particle could defy attempts to predict its position and momentum simultaneously offended him deeply, yet probabilities rather than certainties make for an infinitely creative universe with multi-dimensional possible futures.
A desire to know “the” future, to predict or control it, has attended man’s evolution since time immemorial. When there were no instruments except the five known senses for guidance, man looked to the stars and other natural phenomenon for understanding. Whether a god or gods created man or whether man created his gods remains a subject of debate, but no one argues about the cycles of the sun, moon, and visible planets. In earlier times, those who could predict eclipses and the like were believed to have godly powers.
In modern times, we don’t think of ourselves as superstitious, yet predictions abound, and they have the power to influence large groups of people. But just as you can only predict an electron’s probable location at any given time, you can only predict probable events based on current trends and the beliefs that contribute to them. A study of astrology shows how futile predictions are, because there are so many factors influencing any given moment.
A horoscope is nothing more or less than a symbolic map of a moment in a specific place and time. It is completely impersonal, but an individual’s horoscope, cast for the place and time of birth, describes the potentialities of the moment itself, not of the person incarnated at that time, although that person may manifest some or many of the potentialities indicated in the chart.
The so-called “scientific mind” does not accept anything it can’t measure and “prove” by “objective” criteria, meaning it meets certain “laws” of nature. It’s important to remember these are not necessarily nature’s “laws” but man’s “laws” imposed on nature through mathematics. The ancient Greeks liked symmetry, so conceived of a symmetrical universe, but the cycles of time defy symmetry. Calendars reflect the difficulty of fitting the solar system into mathematical laws. The earth refuses to orbit the sun in exactly 365 days but must take a quarter day extra to make its ellipse (not a circle) complete. The lunar day is a mathematically inconvenient 24 hours and 50 minutes. In short, it’s a wobbly universe, not predictable, but in terms of the human time frame, stable enough.
Science doesn’t have the instruments to detect subtle fields or the “essences” of things. It approaches the “essence” idea with its relatively recent discovery of the electromagnetic spectrum, of which light is the most obvious manifestation. Astrology and the loose assortment of “psychic” phenomena, operate like electromagnetic energy, on the principle of vibrational patterns or frequencies. The Oriental concept of qi, or “life force,” which permeates everything, may approach this idea of energy patterns that are as yet beyond the scope of human instrumentation.
Anyone fully indoctrinated into modern “scientific” thinking might be justifiably skeptical of the claim that there are energy fields outside scientific measurement. Such people might scoff at the idea that human thought has the power to influence “the” future, yet science has begun to approach that threshold with quantum physics. That the experimenter influences the experiment–and is necessarily a subjective part of the experiment–shatters the illusion that true objectivity is possible.
Attempts to predict “the” future are also attempts to control “the” future, and those who predict catastrophe become invested in the futures they predict. They thus take subtle steps to bring about the future they fear, even though it may be disastrous.
It becomes a question of free will and the notion that you can choose what you think about. Those who believe in pre-destination , that they are fixed on a path and have no choice but to follow it, do not understand the infinite variations possible within every moment in time.